How BetRank Rates Casinos
Trust Score V3 — 94 criteria across 3 dimensions. Zero paid rankings.
Why We're Different
Core principles94-Point Algorithm
Every score calculated from verified data, not impressions
100% Algorithm-Driven
Every score is calculated from verified data points, not editorial opinion
Quarterly Re-evaluation
Scores expire after 90 days. Every operator is re-tested.
The Three Dimensions
Score compositionCore Trust
50pts50% of total
Offer Quality
35pts35% of total
Payments
15pts15% of total
Core Trust Breakdown
50 points · 6 blocsLicensing & Regulation
/12 pts- Tier of primary licence (MGA, UKGC, Curaçao, etc.)
- Multi-jurisdiction licensing
- Regulatory sanctions history
- Licence verification & public records
Corporate Transparency
/8 pts- Publicly identified parent company
- Published terms & conditions clarity
- Ownership structure disclosure
- Financial stability indicators
Security & Fairness
/8 pts- SSL/TLS encryption standards
- RNG certification & audit reports
- Third-party testing (eCOGRA, iTech Labs, GLI)
Responsible Gambling
/8 pts- Self-exclusion tools availability
- Deposit, loss, and session limits
- Links to support organisations
- Minor protection & age verification
Player Support
/6 pts- 24/7 live chat availability
- Response time under 2 minutes
- Multi-language support
Reputation & History
/8 pts- Years of operation
- Player complaint volume & resolution rate
- Industry awards & recognition
- Public incident history
Offer Quality
35 points · 4 verticalsEach vertical is scored independently on a 0–100 scale, then the active verticals are averaged and weighted to produce up to 35 points. If an operator does not offer a vertical, it is excluded from the average.
Casino
Slot variety, providers, RTP transparency, game UX
/100
Sportsbook
Market depth, odds competitiveness, live betting, cash-out
/100
Live Casino
Studio quality, table limits range, Evolution/Pragmatic coverage
/100
Crypto
Provably fair games, token support, blockchain transparency
/100
Payments
15 points · 4 sub-criteriaMethods Diversity
/5 ptsNumber and variety of deposit/withdrawal methods including fiat, e-wallets, and crypto
Withdrawal Speed
/3 ptsAverage payout processing time across all methods, with penalties for delays over 48 hours
Limits & Fees
/4 ptsMinimum/maximum withdrawal limits, hidden fees, and currency conversion charges
KYC Process
/3 ptsVerification speed, document requirements, and clarity of the KYC process
Modifier H: Complaint Analysis
-10 to +5Modifier H is applied after the base score is calculated. It adjusts the final Trust Score based on verified player complaints over the previous 12 months. Operators with clean records are rewarded; operators with frequent, unresolved complaints are penalised.
| Complaint Volume | Modifier |
|---|---|
| 0-2 complaints / 12 months | +5 |
| 3-5 complaints / 12 months | +2 |
| 6-10 complaints / 12 months | 0 |
| 11-20 complaints / 12 months | -3 |
| 21-50 complaints / 12 months | -6 |
| 50+ complaints / 12 months | -10 |
Verdict Scale
7 levels| Score Range | Verdict |
|---|---|
| 90 – 100 | ELITE |
| 80 – 89 | EXCELLENT |
| 70 – 79 | BON |
| 60 – 69 | CORRECT |
| < 60 | FAIBLE |
What We Don't Do
Editorial policy- ×Never accept payment for higher scores
- ×Never penalize operators who refuse partnership
- ×Never publish unverified data
- ×Never hide negative findings
Methodology FAQ
How often is the Trust Score updated?+
Can an operator pay for a higher Trust Score?+
What happens if an operator loses its licence?+
How does the Complaint Modifier work?+
Why do some operators not have an Offer Quality score?+
See the Scores in Action
Browse our full catalogue of independently rated online casinos, each scored using the Trust Score V3 methodology.
See All Reviews →
